Under what conditions may a qualified telephone interpreter be sworn to interpret in a criminal proceeding?

• A. Only in civil cases
• B. In any criminal proceeding before a judge or magistrate when in-person interpreter is unavailable or inadequate
• C. Only for judges
• D. Only in county with population under 50,000

Answer: (B)

In criminal proceedings, a qualified telephone interpreter may be sworn to interpret when the in-person interpreter is unavailable or inadequate, and this appointment is made before a judge or magistrate. The key idea is ensuring fairness and understanding for all parties by using a sworn interpreter who can accurately convey statements and proceedings even when they can’t be physically present. The judge or magistrate has the authority to authorize this substitution to protect the defendant’s right to a fair trial and the integrity of the process. This option is not limited to civil cases, not restricted to interpreters only for judges, and not tied to county population; it reflects using a sworn, qualified interpreter by telecommunication when in-person services can’t meet the need.